False identification (fake ID) is one of a number of ways that underage individuals obtain alcohol in the United States (Wagenaar, Toomey, Murray, Short, Wolfson & Jones-Webb, 1996). Fake IDs are highly prevalent among underage college students (with fake ID possession rates growing from 12.5% prior to college to 32.2% at the end of students’ second year at one large state university campus; Martinez, Rutledge & Sher, 2007). Moreover, they have been hypothesized to be one of the most common methods of alcohol obtainment for underage students (Fabian, Toomey, Lenk & Erickson, 2008).
Students possessing a fake ID have been found to be more likely than their peers to use alcohol (Durkin, Wolfe & Phillips, 1996; Martinez, et al., 2007). This association appears to strengthen over time as students approach (yet do not reach) the legal drinking age (e.g., pre-college fake ID possession was found to predict first-semester heavy drinking [β=.26], and sophomore fall fake ID possession was found to predict next-semester heavy drinking [β=.46]; Martinez et al., 2007). Of note, underage drinking is extremely problematic and is associated with many minor and serious consequences, (Hingson, Zha & Weitzman, 2009). Additionally, beyond facilitating illegal access to alcohol, it has been argued that “by choosing to use fake IDs, students make ethical compromises that erode respect for the law” (Amethyst Initiative website, 2008). From this perspective, getting and using a fake ID is problematic not only because it increases alcohol use (and related consequences) but because it represents a larger moral hazard by potentially inuring individuals to legal proscriptions on a range of behavior.
Although it is known that some group affiliations such as membership in a college fraternal or sororal (i.e., “Greek”) organization increase the likelihood of obtaining fake IDs (Martinez, et al., 2007), it is not currently known how exactly fake IDs are most commonly obtained and used (e.g., whether it is most often the case that fake IDs are used to gain entry to bars/clubs, or to buy alcohol at off-premise retail outlets), and how often individuals are caught deploying them. Also, it is not known whether and how specific methods of fake ID obtainment and use are associated with heavy drinking. From a prevention science perspective, knowledge of specific processes involved in alcohol access and subsequent use can potentially aid in the development and efficiency of interventions (Coie, Watt, West, Hawkins, Asarnow, Markman, et al., 1993). For example, data that describe fake ID obtainment and use could aid law enforcement efforts by providing information about where and how students are most likely to commit these legal infractions. Such data might also further elucidate the extent and means by which students “make ethical compromises.” Thus, we surveyed 1,098 students on the specifics of their fake ID obtainment and use.